George Montgomerie-Moir, of Leckie, Esq; - - - - appellant. Anne Montgomerie, and Mess. Alexander and Archibald Stevenson, procurators fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh, for their interest, - - - - - - - - - - respondents. The respondents case.

ID 2194
Title George Montgomerie-Moir, of Leckie, Esq; - - - - appellant. Anne Montgomerie, and Mess. Alexander and Archibald Stevenson, procurators fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh, for their interest, - - - - - - - - - - respondents. The respondents case.
Contributors
Signed Author William Grant. W. Murray.
Pseudonym
Firms
Self-published Unknown
Volumes 1
Pagination 3
Date of Publication 1751
Edition Statement
Edition Number
Date of First Publication
Imprint
Colophon
Copyright Statement
Location of Printing London GB
Format Folio (fo)
Length (cm)
Width (cm)
Price (pound)
Price (shilling)
Price (pence)
Total Price (in pence)
Non-UK Price
Genre
Sources
Shelfmarks
Notes
Hand-Verified No
Verified Yes
Attempted Verification No

Cite this Page

Moir, Anne Montgomery. George Montgomerie-Moir, of Leckie, Esq; - - - - appellant. Anne Montgomerie, and Mess. Alexander and Archibald Stevenson, procurators fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh, for their interest, - - - - - - - - - - respondents. The respondents case.The Women's Print History Project, 2019, title ID 2194, https://womensprinthistoryproject.com/title/2194. Accessed 2024-04-19. 

@book{ wphp_2194
  author={Moir,Anne Montgomery},
  year={1751},
  title={George Montgomerie-Moir, of Leckie, Esq; - - - - appellant. Anne Montgomerie, and Mess. Alexander and Archibald Stevenson, procurators fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh, for their interest, - - - - - - - - - - respondents. The respondents case.},
  publisher={},
  address={London},    }

Suggestions and Comments for George Montgomerie-Moir, of Leckie, Esq; - - - - appellant. Anne Montgomerie, and Mess. Alexander and Archibald Stevenson, procurators fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh, for their interest, - - - - - - - - - - respondents. The respondents case.
Follow Up