Cite this Page

Unknown. A defense of the Right Reverend Bishops of Rochester and Bristol: being a full answer to a late virulent pamphlet, entitul'd, Bishop Atterbury's and Bishop Smalridge's reasons for not signing the declaration, lately put forth by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, and the other bishops. With considerations on the Bishop of L-n's letter to his clergy, immediately after His Lordship's signing the said declaration.The Women's Print History Project, 2019, title ID 25462, https://womensprinthistoryproject.com/title/25462. Accessed 2024-02-23.

@book{ wphp_25462
  author={Unknown,},
  year={1716},
  title={A defense of the Right Reverend Bishops of Rochester and Bristol: being a full answer to a late virulent pamphlet, entitul'd, Bishop Atterbury's and Bishop Smalridge's reasons for not signing the declaration, lately put forth by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, and the other bishops. With considerations on the Bishop of L-n's letter to his clergy, immediately after His Lordship's signing the said declaration.},
  publisher={Anne Dodd I},
  address={London},    }

Suggestions and Comments for A defense of the Right Reverend Bishops of Rochester and Bristol: being a full answer to a late virulent pamphlet, entitul'd, Bishop Atterbury's and Bishop Smalridge's reasons for not signing the declaration, lately put forth by the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, and the other bishops. With considerations on the Bishop of L-n's letter to his clergy, immediately after His Lordship's signing the said declaration.
Follow Up